This collective volume examines electoral justice as a multi-layered field, where responsibilities are shared among courts, parliaments, administrations, and independent bodies, producing a fragmented architecture of accountability across European legal systems. Drawing on the Romanian presidential election annulment, the contributions investigate how constitutional adjudication may respond to contemporary threats to elections, including disinformation, opaque digital campaigning, and technology-enabled manipulation. Through comparative analyses and case studies, the book identifies the standards and procedural guarantees required for judicial intervention to reinforce, rather than destabilise, democratic confidence.
This collective volume examines electoral justice as a multi-layered field, where responsibilities are shared among courts, parliaments, administrations, and independent bodies, producing a fragmented architecture of accountability across European legal systems. Drawing on the Romanian presidential election annulment, the contributions investigate how constitutional adjudication may respond to contemporary threats to elections, including disinformation, opaque digital campaigning, and technology-enabled manipulation. Through comparative analyses and case studies, the book identifies the standards and procedural guarantees required for judicial intervention to reinforce, rather than destabilise, democratic confidence.